I am a
firm admirer of your work and congratulate you on being the first free to air
station to include a channel of literally the only thing that would motivate me
to watch free to air television. I should note I have only a limited
understanding of when the word ‘literally’ should be applied.
Now that
whole paragraph is subjective, admittedly, but more importantly I used ‘loose’
and ‘tight’ without creating an analogy about sexual promiscuity. It shows I am
maturing as a person.
To
illustrate my point about your current shows I have picked out a few that
really stand out as “against brand” to use terminology that might be in
marketing vernacular. It sounds pompous and markety enough anyway.
Cutthroat
Kitchen:
Not a cooking show. |
As an honest question, does anyone watch this show? No, don’t answer that, I
don’t think I want to live in a world where that was possible. My story about
potentially remembering eating a kebab that may or may or not have existed has
more in common with a show on the Food Network than Cutthroat Kitchen. Where
the focus is on the pageantry rather than on either the cooking or the food it
just makes me sad. In fact any show including judges can follow that line of
reasoning as well. I can’t smell or taste along with the judge, why should I care
what they think when they don’t even step through the food making process in
detail. You could replace the food element with anything and have the same
show.
Kids cooking/baking competitions:
Smug precocious child competes in a bake-off (or whatever) with other smug
precocious children. These shows make me wonder if it is all pretend or if the
show should be renamed “Ways to get kids to be beaten up at school for acting
like superior jerks”. Granted, I’m not good with titles. I learn nothing about
food and after getting through ten minutes of these shows I question the
existence of God, which is literally a bazillion times less hyperbole than
warranted.
Chopped/Any other competition:
Also, not a fucking cooking show. |
As I mentioned above, the inclusion of judges, even if they are judging food directly,
doesn’t increase the foodiness value of any show. In fact, they take away from
it. Whether a dish is
over or
under seasoned is utterly irrelevant when we weren’t shown how much seasoning
was added in the first place. Every time I need to listen to a critique from a
judge or watch the facial expression of the recipient I am reminded that these
people have emotions which turns this into a Soap Opera. The fact I need to
remind someone that a Soap opera on the Food Network is not a great idea is
disheartening.
Now I
have no particular problem with these shows existing in a general sense, what I
do have a problem with is the timeslots these are played. All slots between
4:00pm and 10:00pm should be allocated to shows you (but more realistically me)
associate with the food shows under my arbitrary definition. A good basic
paradigm to follow is an expert stepping slowly through a few food dishes,
implying that I have the potential to recreate this at home. I can live with
some background on the food or the culture if it doesn’t get in the way of the
recipe.
Also,
please no more average Joe Schmuck as the presenter (or contestant). I’m a Joe Schmuck
and I wouldn’t watch a show about me vaguely cooking or being the vicinity of a
kitchen. Why do people, and by association you, insist this is a good thing?
God dammit, is it Thursday again? |
Also I
congratulate you on the BBQ month programming. I enjoyed the content true, but
my enjoyment came mostly from the fact the prime viewing slots weren’t filled
with terrible American reality TV in the guise of cooking shows. BBQ month was Shark
Week for me. Except it was for more than a week and with far less sharks.
Love to hear from you soon.
JR
0 comments:
Post a Comment